Clarify boundary for historical payment receipt recovery
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,7 +19,11 @@ format, not payment authorization. The old `content.request-invoice` and
|
||||
`content.request-onchain` methods likewise bypassed the durable purchase flows.
|
||||
Fresh legacy spending and invoice/address creation now return actionable errors.
|
||||
Already-owned exact/alias cache reads, existing invoice/on-chain status and
|
||||
original-payment download endpoints remain available. No automatic conversion
|
||||
original-payment download endpoints remain available.
|
||||
This does not reconstruct missing historical Cashu/Fedimint delivery receipts:
|
||||
a legacy spend without a saved file binding/receipt still needs investigation,
|
||||
not another purchase. Generic wallet history alone cannot prove which file a
|
||||
lost legacy request bought. No automatic conversion
|
||||
to another method, payment retry, or bypass of reviewed fee consent was added.
|
||||
|
||||
Compatibility impact: current PeerFiles used the legacy spender for Fedimint;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user