archy/Release & Testing/Provenance.md

Curated documentation snapshot as of 2026-10-24 08:08 UTC. Lane-owner factual review pending unless explicitly stated; not release approval, execution admission, or confirmation that implementation is published.

Provenance and evidence boundaries

Directly inspected local Git bindings

Component	Full commit	Local ref state	Evidence boundary
Platform app lane	9194e2d4a26ae7879188547cc768399c89f28cfd	work/uat-cloud-isolation-20261021	Git HEAD inspected; not public-ref or whole-candidate qualification proof
IndeeHub native reservation	20cbb722755581693546a379b2692450a04a8e67	detached HEAD	Git HEAD inspected; 28 new native tests unrun
IndeeHub signed-admission app	04f9daadd3ea582f7351c9dfd413eeb593d43087	detached HEAD	Git HEAD inspected; owner-recorded isolated 127/7 raw/outer pass

Inspection did not certify clean worktrees or pushed refs. The app owner separately reports the current app source unpublished by that lane, with no canonical proposal/ref receipt; native publication remains unverified. Other local branches and historical sources exist; they must not be mistaken for these latest frozen candidates. No branch is implicitly merged by publishing these docs. Public source URLs/proposals need independent remote verification before inclusion.

Sources and curation

The private canonical completion execution plan, fixed 48-requirement/30-task ledger, platform UAT ticklist/current handoff, IndeeHub qualification/UAT contract, signed-admission checkpoint and current execution-control review informed this collection. Their historical status fields were not adopted wholesale. Current outcome corrections came from implementation and coordinator messages; factual owner sign-off is still requested.

The independently curated execution-control contribution reports all 20 reviewed control hashes matched and r1 was rejected. Model counts 11 receipt + 8 flow + 8 artifact are model evidence only. Its proposed primary/collateral inventory is not runtime success. Exact operational manifests and failed receipts remain private with the owning lanes; public descriptions preserve their semantics without access details.

Recent-claim provenance and cutoff

Cutoff: 2026-10-24 08:08 UTC. Later execution or cleanup outcomes do not silently update this snapshot.

Claim	Source and verification level
Three full source commits/ref states above	Collector read-only Git inspection; clean-tree/remote publication not certified
Current app source unpublished by its lane	App implementation owner statement; not a claim about every historical source
B03 diagnostic r3 operation 1/outer 90, incomplete correlation and surviving provider	Latest app-owner outcome report before cutoff; collector did not rerun or independently inspect runtime
Earlier D09 disposable transport/rollback and remaining installed gates	App canonical handoff/ticklist and implementation outcome reports; bounded source-specific evidence
Signed-admission app 127/7 raw/outer pass, native 28 unrun	Native canonical checkpoint plus manager corroboration; not collector runtime execution
First native sequence rejected R1–R5; successor unreviewed	Testing owner's curated independent review; testing owner approved these documentation boundaries
Fixed 48 requirements, 30 task definitions and mandatory scenarios	Canonical scope ledger, platform ticklist and qualification/UAT contracts; owner reconciliation of current per-scenario evidence remains pending

A bounded factual review was requested from both implementation owners; no whole-lane approval had arrived by cutoff. The native implementation owner subsequently confirmed the two exact clean detached candidate hashes, app 127/7 zero-skipped raw/outer pass, native 28 UNRUN, proposed 84+69 inventory, rejected r1/unreviewed r2, and missing paired financial driver. That approval covers only these current native/app statements, not the full matrix or historical installed evidence. The platform app owner also approved the bounded source/open-status statements in Non-IndeeHub-Execution and matrix B–E/eight-app rows, correcting pagination to 251 items across a 250-item page boundary and adding the r3 client observations. Both corrections are incorporated. Neither review is full-plan evidence certification or release approval. Unverified evidence stays explicit. Publication of this scoped process does not require waiting for product completion and does not close the remaining review checklist.

Publication review checklist

• Both lane owners reconcile full IDs, source bindings, commands, completed/open exits and stale historical wording.
• Testing owner reviewed the execution-control contribution (R1–R5/native evidence boundaries only); command quoting correction applied. This is not full-plan/product approval.
• Full scenario matrix and remaining process mappings reconciled with implementation owners.
• Final integrator manually reviewed all eight documents, checked all local links and the 48-requirement/30-task inventory, and ran a narrow private-data scan. No raw reports, implementation commits, credentials or operational attachments were imported. These checks are not a guarantee that all possible sensitive information can be detected.
• Initial docs proposal 8ef4306df1b88fcb7275245cf855c993c2170ba423ba2f6ce80758c0e188a8af published on ngit. Commit ffa93a041e8667920f9a74ba18b70affd8886ad0 was advertised identically by two Git servers; an independent fresh fetch verified all eight document bytes. Subsequent updates require their own remote verification; this is not a merge into main.
• Implementation ref visibility separately verified; docs publication is not implementation publication.

Exclude credentials/keys, access URLs, machine identifiers/addresses, home paths, runtime identities/PIDs/CIDs, private logs/screenshots/user/financial/session data and raw handoffs. Retain useful public source commits, test semantics, failure/UNRUN facts and review limits. No private operational attachment is required to read these summaries.